top of page

Alamo Colleges District

The shift: Improve student completion by focusing the entire system on a single, influenceable outcome

​

Execution challenge

Alamo Colleges served a highly diverse, predominantly part-time student population: first-generation students, veterans, dual-credit students, working adults with families.

​

At the system level, leaders faced a familiar problem:

  • A strategic plan with many well-intended imperatives

  • Multiple campuses and departments pursuing worthy but disconnected initiatives

  • Widespread belief that “we’re already doing everything we can”

​

The challenge was not commitment — it was cohesion and discipline.

​

Organizational lag measure (WIG / outcome)

  • Increase the number of degrees and certificates awarded
    This was chosen deliberately as the ultimate expression of student success — not effort, not activity, but completion.

 

System-level decomposition (lag → lead)

 

Rather than prescribing tactics, leadership aligned 190+ teams to the same WIG and required each unit to determine how they could influence it.

 

Example A: Student Retention Focus

 

Department lag measure

  • Increase fall-to-fall retention

 

Lead measures

  • Early identification of at-risk students

  • Proactive outreach earlier in the semester (not after failure)

  • Regular faculty engagement cadence with struggling students

 

This produced a redesigned mentorship model driven by lead behavior, not post-hoc intervention.

 

Example B: Academic Departments (Sciences / Nursing)

 

Department lag measure

  • Increase course retention rates

 

Lead measures

  • Weekly engagement with at-risk students

  • Faculty discussion of lead behaviors during cadence meetings

  • Real-time adjustments during the semester (not end-of-term analysis)

 

Even when targets were narrowly missed, retention reached historic highs — evidence of execution progress, not symbolic effort.

 

Example C: Mental Health Services

 

Department lag measure

  • Increase student utilization of counseling services (from ~0% to 60%)

 

Lead measures

  • Collaboration with advisors (who students already saw)

  • Reducing barriers to initial engagement

  • Reframing counseling as a support pathway, not a crisis service

 

What happened along the way

  • Focus unified the system.

  • Autonomy was preserved at the team level.

  • Energy expanded rather than narrowed.

 

Departments pursued the same WIG in 200 different ways, but with a shared scoreboard.

 

Ancillary benefits

  • 17% increase in degrees and certificates in eight months

  • Stronger faculty engagement outside the classroom

  • Leaders reported a shift from policing outcomes to enabling execution

 

Key takeaway:
Execution improved when completion became the organizing principle — and teams were trusted to decompose it.

​

bottom of page